Should It Come to That
by Arnie Yasinski
Writing a Mystery
would make all the difference, I’ve been told, in enduring the boredom of cocooning or, heaven forbid, self- quarantine. I assume I would decide the mystery first, traditionally murder, because it defines a focus and field of play. There’s the whole how and why, clues dropped, locale, cultural context (pandemic?); just who the victim is and his connections, inevitable eccentricities of the investigator, so the world doesn’t feel as random as it is now. Then subtleties of pace. Do we see it happen or is it weighted toward the aftermath? Discover how a coronavirus can be a murder weapon? It must be about a current kind of world. How strongly does causation hold or do things happen out of tendency and habit of character or a fetish of one little event linking precisely with the next? I want a consistent view that can be chillingly evoked by a crime solver, perhaps a little eccentric, the sweep of whose life has the potential to be understood over a series of books, should it come to that. The reader should come to care about him or her in their complexity and imperfection, and so feel empathy for a mind and heart at the center of things. I also want the crime solver to stand as avatar of the author, the I who so much wants to be liked that he tries to get what he wants by commissioning murder; the I as subtly swashbuckling detective dogging the perpetrator, careful not to catch on too soon.
How It Was
A caller hangs up. We’ve been reading Updike, so I steal the line because she will recognize it: “It must have been your lover.” A year later she confirms the unwitting truth. She works with bankers—bland, successful, suits, aftershave. I remember later on that she had introduced him at a party for no apparent reason. When I am uneasy about business trips, she disparages my suspicions just enough to keep me quiet. It’s not clear whether she ever wishes for more than assignations. Complexities of relationship flatten, attenuate as dissimulation requires. Losing her grip on nuance is what leads in the end to revelation. We learn more of what Updike knew. I forgive her the physical part.
Zooming
When peering electronically at each other we might assume we’ll end up eye to eye but they appear to be looking down because they’re looking at me not into the camera, the same way I am looking at them, not the floor. This gives us the rare opportunity of examining the faces of the other with unexpected impunity. We slyly imagine we are drilling into ancestries, sampling abstractions of race, seeing them briefly as Celt or Norseman or Jew, mistaken or not. Then perhaps it’s easier to linger longer on the specifics of personality and character as they speak nakedly to the electronic eye, unaware how much they are revealing of impatience, kindness, self-regard, forbearance, dissimulation. Still more comes to fore when the app mutes all but the first and loudest, and mouths move as some try to keep on talking over the rest. Others, like schoolkids, hoist a hand, patiently and impatiently. Will we really be willing to give this up when we’re back again face-to-face?
Arnie Yasinski is a retired college administrator, born American but now living in Ireland with his Irish wife. He’s a father and grandfather who holds a PhD in English and wrote his first poem at fifty. He has published poems in four dozen US journals and has two collections, Proposition and God lives in Norway and goes by Christie, both published by 21st Century Renaissance in Ireland.
Copyright © Mudlark 2021
Mudlark Flashes | Home Page